i have some great sounding gear now, but i almost dread when someone calls for me to jam. In the end.laziness usually controls my gear purchases. i played one of the first Bugera 333XL's and really liked the tone, but luckily i waited a little while and found the first batch to have issues.good thing i didn't get stuck with one of those heads. but resale value may make it a better choice if you ever want to sell it.īoth are new technologies and the first consumers to buy them will be the ones that can tell if they hold up under use. Pricewise: the Marshall will end up being a little more expensive. they gotta make a living too.but they will assemble any bad design that a company pays for to make a buck, then the company blames China when the design flaw causes failures. they claim they can emulate several different tubes, which is great for tweakers.if it actually sounds accurate.īut both are made in China.so that might end the tube vs solid state longevity argument. The Blackstar uses all emulated solid state stuff.no tubes. the downside is that you only get one power tube tone, albeit a good classic tone. The Marshall uses E元4 tubes for power, which is great to crank up and compress for that natural marshall tone. i only need 4 good channels with some moderate effects, and both of these heads fit the bill. I was looking into both of these heads.because they are the evolution of everything i wanted since the 80's. Before anyone flames me for even mentioning these heads on this forum, i just wanted to add that some of us older 80's shredders no longer gig or can afford massive (or expensive) rigs because of family obligations.but we still want to shred when we get a chance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |